Opinion Factsheet  

Storitveni sveženj: posodobljeno stališče evropskih lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti

BGCSDADEELENESETFIFRGAHRHUITLTLVMTNLPLPTROSKSLSV
Opinion Number: CDR 150/2020
Rapporteur: VANRAES Jean-Luc
Commission: ECON
Status: Adopted
Date: 02/07/2020
 
Since the adoption of the CoR's opinion on the services package in October 2017, the ECJ's 2018 "Visser Vastgoed" ruling has shed new light on the current notification regime under the services package. Also the Commission's legislative proposals on the European services e-card and the notification procedure have not been approved yet, which could raise questions regarding the issues these proposals are aimed to address. In this context, the CoR is preparing a revised opinion on the services package.

The revised CoR opinion is aimed at setting our the CoR's position on the proposed new notification rules for member states, and the implications of the ECJ's Visser Vastgoed judgment and how these might be dealt with in the framework of the new notification directive.

It looks at which new initiatives are needed in order to tackle barriers to cross-border provision of services and what types of initiatives should be envisaged.

An important point at issue concerns the proposal for binding rulings by the Commission in relation to the compatibility of notified draft laws and regulations with the Services Directive. In the context of the on-going policy debate, the opinion puts forward the CoR's view on this issue.

Finally, the ECJ's Visser Vastgoed judgement raises potentially important issues for local authorities relating to administrative burden and delay associated with notification of land-use plans, possible uncertainty about the validity and applicability of zoning plans, and possible intrusion in local authorities' freedom to regulate local matters falling within their responsibility. The opinion formulates the CoR's stance on how the notification rules could be adapted in the light of the ECJ ruling.

THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS



- acknowledges that the Single Market is a major achievement of EU policy that underpins European competitiveness, prosperity and consumer well-being; underlines that a properly functioning Single Market also contributes to boosting economic growth, innovation and employment at regional and local levels and that regional and local authorities, as important public procurers, benefit from a better functioning Single Market, including in services;

- stresses that unjustified barriers to the cross-border provision of services, mainly resulting from diverging national rules and procedures, are among the main causes of the sector's poor performance and that removing these obstacles would give service providers and customers greater opportunities to make full use of the potential of the Single Market, that further action should be based on demonstrated needs of service providers; that the enormous diversity of services sectors may require a more sector-specific approach and that regional and local governments could play an important role in solving the problems that arise;

- points out that without the implementation of a services e-card, cross-border service providers still face the same costs in fulfilling administrative formalities and that the services e-card was supposed to reduce these by half, which would have been of major benefit to SMEs;

- sees an opportunity in the improvement of the notification procedure under the Services Package to address the issues raised by the ECJ's Visser Vastgoed ruling and calls upon the co-legislators to concentrate their efforts on coming up with solutions during the current negotiations on the notification procedure, which also ensure that the procedure provides the necessary legal certainty;

- stresses that many local and regional authorities face challenges in terms of capacity and resources to cope with the administrative burden of the current legal notification obligation – in view of the ECJ's ruling – and that any new notification procedure should take this into account in order to reduce that administrative burden as much as possible.